Is George Soros the Danger?

Image credits: A worried George Soros.

There are the laws of nature. There is gravity. There is death.
And then there is George Soros.

Soros is not just a man. He’s a phenomenon. A walking worldview. A kind of omniscient grandfather who moves bonds with one hand and rewrites the morality of continents with the other. To some, he’s a philanthropist. To others, he’s the end boss of globalism, disguised as a human rights activist with an investment portfolio.

By Max von Kreyfelt
He’s 93, practically immortal, and always shows up in crises where money and ideology converge just a little too perfectly. Syria? Ukraine? Brussels? Minneapolis? The answer is often the same: “That must be Soros again.”

And strangely enough, it often is.

His Open Society Foundations are like a bottomless ATM for anyone preaching the gospel of a borderless world. Whether you’re a climate activist with a cardboard sign or a five-story NGO in Geneva, there’s usually a pot of Soros money nearby. All, of course, in the name of the greater good: more inclusion, less tradition. More mobility, less identity. More rights, less society.

The narrative is straightforward: if you still believe in borders, culture, or biological differences, you’re a threat to the open society. And wouldn’t you know it: Soros is the high priest of that open society, provided he holds the keys to the gate.

He is the invisible hand behind everything that starts with high ideals and ends in bureaucratic catastrophe. Mass migration as a human rights fetish. Climate policy as a revenue model for multinationals. Judges as ideological sponsors of social re-education. Media are manicured megaphones with tax-exempt status. All in the Soros style: morally righteous, financially engineered, and democratically unaccountable.

And then there are the elections. Be it Hungary, the U.S., Ukraine, or Amsterdam-West—you can set your watch by it: when an outcome is inconvenient, a Soros-funded “citizen initiative” appears. He supports the opposition, but sometimes the coalition too. He funds the judges and the activists who protest them. He’s not on one side of the chessboard—he owns the board and runs the tournament.

Is Soros all-powerful? Not at all. He has more influence than the Pope, more money than some countries, and more NGOS than a typical UN summit venue. But power? No, no. He merely “supports processes.”

And anyone who says otherwise is instantly labelled an anti-Semite, extremist, or geopolitical lunatic. Because that’s part of the game: George is untouchable. Not because he’s divine, but because he is the system. A system that protects itself by morally disarming all critique.

George Soros is no longer a man. He’s a model. A self-perpetuating mechanism of capital, influence, and ideology: operating without oversight, without brakes, and shame.

And that, dear reader, is the real danger.

 

Max von Kreyfelt

Max von Kreyfelt is a well-known Dutch public figure. He is known as an independent thinker, opinion maker, and initiator of critical media platforms. He has played a key role in questioning power, the role of the mainstream media, and social structures. He was the founder of The Netherlands' most prominent opposition TV-channel Cafe WeltSchmertz.
See full bio >

More articles you might like

Filip Dewinter’s forbidden speech on remigration: “The only answer to the 'Great Replacement’”

The French government recently banned a conference on remigration. This ban was imposed across the […]
- by Rami Audi on 04/11/2026

After the midterms: Trump's exodus and the long road through the American wilderness

The American midterm elections have brought Donald Trump's political revolution to a defining moment. Democrats […]

Syria’s Alawite women under threat: A growing crisis of abduction, sexual violence and impunity

A new international study has drawn attention to the growing body of evidence concerning the […]
- by Rami Audi on 02/11/2026

France and the death of a common world: When a republic can no longer make a nation

France has never been merely a country. It has been an idea about what a […]

Why commemorating the murder of Theo van Gogh († 2004) remains important

Inspired by Daniel Clarke-Serret’s article, this piece explores why commemorating the murder of Theo van […]

France is burning; will the Netherlands be next?

Street fighting, arson, and scenes more reminiscent of a civil war than a demonstration: in […]