The Lebanon Tribunal: the case, suspects and evidence

Image credits: The Special Tribunal in Leidschendam. Picture by Arthur Blok

Judges at The Special Tribunal for Lebanon are due to give their verdict on Tuesday in the trial of four men accused over the 2005 Beirut bombing that killed former Lebanese Prime Minister Rafik Hariri and 21 others.

Hariri, a Sunni Muslim billionaire seen as a threat to Iranian and Syrian influence in Lebanon, had close ties with the United States, Western and Sunni Gulf Arab allies opposed to Iran's expanding role in Lebanon and the region.

Here is a look at the tribunal and the defendants.

TRIBUNAL

The Special Tribunal for Lebanon is an international court set up jointly by the United Nations and Lebanon to try suspects in the 2005 bombing and other political killings in Lebanon around the same time. Tuesday's verdict will be the first since its creation.

DEFENDANTS

The defendants, being tried in absentia, are Salim Jamil Ayyash, Hassan Habib Merhi, Assad Hassan Sabra and Hussein Hassan Oneissi. All are members of Hezbollah, the Iran-backed Lebanese Shi'ite group. All are charged with conspiracy to commit a terrorist attack, while Ayyash is charged with committing a terrorist act, the homicide of 22 people, and the attempted homicide of 226. The others are charged as accomplices. Hezbollah denies involvement in killing Hariri, a Sunni.

UNKNOWN WHEREABOUTS

The defendants' whereabouts are not known. They are not in custody and have not participated in their trial, though judges ruled they are aware of the charges against them. The defendants have not appeared or spoken in public since the trial started, nor communicated with the court-appointed lawyers representing them. If they do show up at any time during the case they have the right to a retrial or appeal.

PROSECUTORS

Prosecutors, led by Canadian Norman Farrell, allege that Ayyash was central to the planning and the execution of the assassination. The men are also accused of preparing a false claim of responsibility to deflect blame. Prosecutors say the men, as Hezbollah supporters, may have been motivated by a desire for Syrian involvement in Lebanon to continue, a policy "which Hariri threatened".

EVIDENCE

During the 2014-2018 trial judges heard from 297 witness. Prosecutors presented what they call a "mosaic of evidence" mostly based on mobile phone records. Prosecutors say the pattern of phone calls shows the men were observing Hariri in the months before his assassination, and that they helped to coordinate and time the attack.

DEFENCE

Lawyers for the accused men say there is no direct evidence linking their clients to the mobile phones identified by the prosecution. They have asked for acquittal.

VERDICT

Tuesday's ruling will decide only whether the four accused have been proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. If they are convicted, sentencing hearings would be held later. They could face a maximum sentence of life.

HAGUE COURT

In 2009 the U.N. established the court in Leidschendam, a suburb of The Hague, Netherlands, which houses numerous international courts, to ensure it could operate securely and independently. The "hybrid" court's rules are based on Lebanese criminal law and international law, and judges are a mix of Lebanese and international magistrates.

With agencies

 

Arthur Blok

Veteran journalist, author, moderator and entrepreneur. The man with the unapologetic opinion who is always ready to help you understand and simplify the most complex (global) matters. Just ask.
See full bio >
The Liberum runs on your donation. Fight with us for a free society.
Donation Form (#6)

More articles you might like

Being well-connected does not always lead to career growth

Conventional wisdom says that when it comes to career growth, it’s not about what you […]

Rebirth – Gareth Edwards, the dino comeback kid

Jurassic World: Rebirth (2025) has received a lot of criticism, and undeservedly so. It’s actually […]
- by The Liberum on 05/07/2025

The Wolf among Jackals: Azerbaijan’s Battle against Russia and Iran

Bordered by a humiliated Russia to the north and a defeated Iran to the south, […]

Managing the Paradox

Special contradictions characterise the war in the Middle East. The enemies and friends of old […]

Azerbaijan’s pushback against Russia and Iran is Redefining its Regional Role

The South Caucasus is emerging as a critical subsystem in the evolving architecture of Eurasian […]

Europe and America: One System, Two Faces of the Digital Dictatorship

There’s still a widespread illusion that the world order is divided between clashing superpowers, political […]