US military concealed truth of airstrikes that killed Syrian civilians

The U.S. military covered up airstrikes in 2019 in Syria that killed up to 64 women and children, a possible war crime, during the fight against Islamic State, the New York Times reported Saturday. The two back-to-back airstrikes near the city of Baghuz were reportedly ordered by a classified U.S. special operations unit tasked with conducting land operations in Syria.

The newspaper said the U.S. Central Command, which oversaw U.S. air operations in Syria, acknowledged the attacks for the first time this week and said they were justified.

In a statement on Saturday, the Central Command reiterated the report it gave the newspaper that 80 people had been killed in the attacks, including 16 Islamic State fighters and four civilians. The military said it was unclear if the other 60 people were civilians, in part because women and children could have been combatants.

In Saturday’s statement, the military said the attacks were “legitimate self-defense”, proportionate and that “appropriate steps were taken to rule out the presence of civilians.”

“We abhor the loss of innocent lives and take all possible measures to prevent them. In this case, we have self-reported and investigated the strike according to our own evidence and take full responsibility for the unintentional loss of life,” the Central Command said.!3&btvi=1&fsb=1&xpc=QNijCxTTgJ&p=https%3A//

The number of civilians among the 60 killed could not be determined because “several armed women and at least one armed child were observed” in video of the events, it said, adding that the majority of the 60 were likely combatants.

The Central Command said the attacks took place while the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) were under heavy fire and in danger of being overrun, and the SDF had declared the area free of civilians.

The Secretary of Defense’s Inspector General launched an investigation into the incident on March 18, 2019, but its report was eventually “removed” from any mention of the bombing, and a thorough, independent investigation never took place, according to the Times. The newspaper said its report was based on confidential documents and descriptions of classified reports, as well as interviews with directly involved staff.

An air force attorney present at the operations center at the time believed the strikes were possible war crimes and later warned the Secretary of Defense and the Senate Armed Services Committee when no action was taken, the Times said.

Source: Algulf


The Liberum

Vox Populi, Vox Dei
See full bio >
The Liberum runs on your donation. Fight with us for a free society.
Donation Form (#6)

More articles you might like

Petro preferences – A ‘novel’ way to answer lingering questions

The story is semi-science fiction set in the very near future. Iran is at war with Saudi Arabia, and the only way the Saudis can tip the balance back in their favour is to buy up General Motors, the company manufacturing Iran’s superior tanks. Worse still, the villainous Iran here is led by none other than the Shah

Meeting in the Middle - Khalil Gibran translated for today, SF from tomorrow

There was an interesting Zoom conference on Lebanese poet, writer and artist Khalil Gibran, where […]

Proportionality in this Gaza war is neither possible nor desirable

Proportionality in the Israel-Gaza war is impossible and undesirable. This is a paradoxical statement that […]

Was Kahlil Gibran a Bolshevik? The Classified FBI (BOI) Files Explained

Edgar B. Speer, special agent for the Buro of Investigation (BOI) in Pittsburgh in August […]
- by Arthur Blok on 31/12/2023

The Liberum’s highlights of 2023: From Dubai Bling to Global Disasters & Arab Science Fiction

The last hours of 2023. It was another wild ride, just like the previous year. […]
- - by Arthur Blok on 24/12/2023

Lebanon’s Elders hit hard by the Economic Collapse of the State

Once upon a time, in the final phase of the Lebanese civil war (1975-1990), there […]