Remigration is not just a slogan or an empty phrase. It's a realistic concept, a feasible scenario, and above all, an operational plan. Remigration is the only alternative to the multicultural chaos that Europe has fallen into. Mass immigration and the demographic decline of the European population are causing native Europeans to be replaced by Third World immigrants. A simple halt to immigration is no longer sufficient. The enemy has been within the walls for some time, and the threat from within has become as great as the threat from outside.

By Filip Dewinter
Remigration means the organised, orderly, and humane return of unwanted foreigners to their countries of origin. Criminals, undocumented immigrants, and maladjusted immigrants who have abused our hospitality must be forcibly repatriated, if at all possible, with their consent and cooperation. With goodwill when possible, with bad will when necessary.

Remigration will certainly not proceed as it did in Algeria or South Africa. The Algerian model of "La valise ou la cercueil" or the South African model of "Kill the boer, kill the farmer" are certainly not the models for the remigration operation we desire.

Operation "Wetback," organised in the United States in the 1950s by then-President Dwight Eisenhower, which achieved the assisted return of more than one million undocumented Mexicans from the USA to Mexico, is a good example. Current President Donald Trump also frequently refers to Operation "Wetback" to implement his remigration plan.

Remigration is necessary because it's an illusion that tightening existing asylum, immigration, and nationality laws can avert the collapse of multicultural society. The ruling political class has allowed the immigration invasion to drag on for too long without intervening.

Successive generations of politicians and policymakers—blinded by their unwavering belief in the all-encompassing multiculturalism—have turned a blind eye and looked the other way, hoping that the multicultural experiment would be less than expected. These young, affordable immigrants from the developing world, after all, represented a cheap labour force, which was applauded by industry and big business.

The influx of guest workers in the 1960s and 1970s—through family reunification, asylum, and even illegal immigration—followed by entire tribes of people from North Africa and Africa, shattered the illusion of an easy solution to the ageing and demographic decline of the European population.

Multiculturalism has since evolved from a purely factual consequence of mass immigration into the ideology of the Western ruling elite. The melting pot of people and cultures has become a progressive left-liberal project and a future perspective to be pursued.

Under the banner of "diversity," the primary goal was cultural and societal assimilation and equality. Cultures, values, norms, traditions, religions—in short, identity—were outdated, conservative, and outdated. Multiculturalism, anti-racism, and diversity were and remain the watchwords of the globalist political agenda imposed on the masses by international organisations like the United Nations, the World Economic Forum, the IMF, the European Union, and others. The economic and cultural elite choose globalisation and open borders as the easiest way to create the "melting-pot" society.

Reversed colonisation
The consequences of decades of uncontrolled mass immigration to Europe are now visible and tangible. The situation in many major European cities, where entire districts have been transformed into African and/or Arab-Muslim ghettos where chaos and impunity reign, is a harbinger of what awaits all of Europe in the long term.

The population change is taking its toll. Those who import the Third World should not be surprised to find themselves in the Third World. Islam has cleverly exploited mass immigration and demographic evolution to colonise and Islamise Europe. Within a few decades, cities like Antwerp, Brussels, Marseille, Paris, Berlin, Malmö, and London will have become Islamic caliphates.

In the relatively short term, we will be confronted with Islamic enclaves that will have a Muslim majority across our borders and will fall prey to a hostile takeover by Islam. This reverse colonisation will, sooner or later, lead to a physical confrontation between the remaining resilient portion of the native European population and the imported Muslim colonists.

Ethnic-religious civil war
If Europe does not choose remigration, we face four scenarios. The first scenario is that of subjugation. Think of it as the Islamic colonisation of Europe, in which Europeans submit to Islam, whether willingly or unwillingly.

A situation similar to the one we experienced in southern Spain for nearly 800 years, from 711 to 1492. The second scenario is that of a violent ethnic-cultural civil war that will bring chaos and devastation throughout Europe.

A third scenario is that of voluntary but peaceful ethnic separatism, in which Muslim foreigners withdraw to their assigned or already conquered territories and cities. At the same time, the native European population continues to live elsewhere.

A fourth and final scenario is remigration. In any case, there is not much time left to bring "operation remigration" to a successful and peaceful conclusion.

Mass immigration and demographic changes are gradually making the situation untenable. Signs of an impending physical confrontation are already present. Radical Islamic groups and terrorist organisations such as the Muslim Brotherhood, ISIS, Al Qaeda, etc., do not shy away from violence to frighten and intimidate the native European population.

From terrorist attacks to stabbings and fights to sexual assault against women: these are the harbingers of even more and more explicit violence. Churches set on fire, police stations attacked, and fire trucks and ambulances pelted with stones are symbolic examples of how the government and institutions of the countries hosting Muslim foreigners are targeted.

The Islamic no-go zones in our cities are the hotbeds from which the revolt against our European society is organised.

Operation Remigration
Of the four scenarios outlined, remigration is the only one that ensures Europe's cultural, social, economic, and geopolitical survival. All other scenarios lead to subjugation, loss of identity and sovereignty, or to violence and confrontation.

The spectre of a civil war is certainly less utopian than some think and others hope. Professor David Betz, a professor at the Department of War at King's College London, recently wrote several academic articles on the subject in the scientific journal Military Strategic Magazine.

He argues that the disruption of our European society resulting from mass immigration could lead to a civil war in the relatively short term, pitting cities colonised by non-European foreigners against the rest of the (native) population.

Samuel Huntington also warns of a similarly disastrous development in his book "The Clash of Civilisations." Incidentally, it's entirely plausible that the large-scale jihadist terrorist attacks in Paris, Brussels, London, Madrid, and other European cities were solely intended to provoke such a civil war.

By causing as many innocent civilian casualties as possible, radical Islamic organisations aim to provoke a shock effect, resulting in a violent confrontation. By destabilising Europe in this way and creating a large-scale conflict (read: civil war), they aim to achieve a partial or complete hostile Islamic takeover of cities, regions, and even countries.

There's not much time left. The "point of no return" is upon us. Either they opt for a decisive approach through "Operation Remigration," or we're headed for chaos and violence in Europe!