Biden’s nuclear weapons policy carries ‘the seeds of a new nuclear arms race’

Image credits: Biden is deliberating the nuclear option in the face of Russia over Ukraine. [Getty Images]

Experts say the White House’s new nuclear strategy is a major missed opportunity to change American policy for the better.

By Connor Echols

Following months of delays, the Biden administration released its Nuclear Posture Review Thursday. The document declares that “the fundamental role of nuclear weapons is to deter nuclear attack on the United States, our Allies, and partners,” while also stating that America’s nuclear arsenal could be used to deter conventional “attacks that have a strategic effect against the United States or its Allies and partners.”

The policy falls short of what some hoped would be a significant shift to American nuclear posture following President Joe Biden’s statements on the campaign trail, according to Daryl Kimball of the Arms Control Association.

“This broad and ambiguous nuclear weapons declaratory policy walks back President Biden’s earlier position and pledge to narrow the role of U.S. nuclear weapons,” Kimball said in a statement, adding that “policies that threaten the first use of nuclear weapons” carry “unacceptable risks.”

The policy document’s release comes amid a spike in concern about the potential for nuclear war. Notably, Russian President Vladimir Putin has suggested on multiple occasions that he would use nuclear weapons in order to “defend” territory that he has attempted to wrest from Ukraine, and the United States reportedly plans to move a more accurate version of its primary nuclear weapon to Europe.

During a press conference Thursday, Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin emphasized the importance of maintaining open channels of communication with Moscow in order to avoid escalation. 

“As long as we have the channels of communication open, and we’re able to communicate what’s important to us, then I think we have an opportunity to manage escalation,” Austin said.

In the spirit of de-escalation, the new posture review also called for efforts to eliminate nuclear weapons in the long term and expressed Biden’s desire to end a submarine-launched tactical nuke program, which Kimball called a “destabilizing and very expensive new capability.”

However, the document also endorses the multi-trillion dollar plan to modernize America’s nuclear arsenal and maintains a different tactical nuclear program, a pair of moves that “carry the seeds of a new nuclear arms race,” according to Bill Hartung of the Quincy Institute.

“The current U.S. arsenal is more than sufficient to deter any nation from attacking the United States,” Hartung said. “Building more nuclear weapons is both excessive and dangerous.”

Source: Responsible Statecraft

 

The Liberum

Vox Populi, Vox Dei
See full bio >
The Liberum runs on your donation. Fight with us for a free society.
Donation Form (#6)

More articles you might like

Sinners (2025) – Minorities, Music and the Money vampires

A lot of hype has been generated, in a positive way, about this outlandish movie […]

Armenian Political Constraints on the Peace Process with Azerbaijan

The peace process between Armenia and Azerbaijan has entered a phase where its feasibility depends […]
- by Ahmad Ghosn on 14/06/2025

All Roads Lead to an Iranian Nuclear Bomb

The world is watching Israel’s wide-scale military operation “Rising Lion” targeting nuclear and military infrastructure […]

Bent to My Will – Parallel dimensions in Egyptian hands

I had the good fortune of participating in Balticon 59 and took the opportunity to […]

Arthur Schopenhauer and Academic Freedom

When Paul Cliteur began lecturing at Leiden University in the Netherlands (1984), he was strongly […]

The Substance – The art of wrinkle-free body-horror

A lot of hoopla has been made of Demi Moore’s latest movie, The Substance (2024), […]