Ursula von der Leyen stays on her Throne of Lies and Cowardice

Image credits: Ursula von der Leyen in better days.

Ursula von der Leyen has survived the motion of no confidence. Not because she refuted anything. Not because she explained anything. And certainly not because she brought any transparency. She survived because the European Parliament, that theatre of pseudo-democracy, prefers to bow to power rather than face the truth.

By Max von Kreyfelt
The reason – secret text messages with Pfizer during the billion-euro vaccine deals – is embarrassing enough. But the spectacle that followed was downright disgraceful. The Commission president admits to having direct contact with the Pfizer CEO. She admits to personally negotiating. But the content? Still classified. Why? No explanation. Just because.

European loyalty: those who stay silent, survive.

The motion came from the “wrong side” and was therefore dismissed in advance. Its content was ignored, the messenger vilified. The Social Democrats threatened to abstain, but eventually voted against – once von der Leyen dangled the Social Fund as bait. Classic EU politics: buy off criticism, call it stability, and sweep the rest under the carpet.

The Greens added their twist. According to them, this wasn’t the time to “give oxygen to the far right.” Because in Brussels, corruption isn’t the real danger – it’s that someone might ask the wrong questions about it.

Power without memory, politics without spine

What remains is a president who lies, a parliament that nods, and a Union that treats its citizens like inconvenient stage props. Von der Leyen’s position may be secure, but her authority is evaporating.

She no longer governs – she is tolerated. Her Commission is a technocratic fortress that strikes billion-euro deals behind closed doors, dodges accountability, and justifies itself with the one argument that still works: “If we fall, worse will come.”

Meanwhile, discontent grows – even in the political centre. After the summer, a new motion of no confidence looms, this time not from the far right, but from parties who finally realise that loyalty to an unaccountable system might be political suicide, not out of principle, but out of fear.

The show goes on.

Von der Leyen stays. But the chair beneath her creaks. She no longer leads – she hangs on. Her Commission is a system of backroom power, public opacity, and moral deflection. It survives not through strength, but through blackmail.

Not through vision, but through fear. And most of all: not through truth, but through the systematic silencing of anyone who dares to demand it.

 

Max von Kreyfelt

Max von Kreyfelt is a well-known Dutch public figure. He is known as an independent thinker, opinion maker, and initiator of critical media platforms. He has played a key role in questioning power, the role of the mainstream media, and social structures. He was the founder of The Netherlands' most prominent opposition TV-channel Cafe WeltSchmertz.
See full bio >
The Liberum runs on your donation. Fight with us for a free society.
Donation Form (#6)

More articles you might like

by Emile Fakhoury on 31/08/2026

The Adaptive Advantage: What career mobility really builds

For years, a resume full of moves was treated as a warning sign. Hiring managers […]

After Ceuta, the focus is on migrants from the Maghreb: Moroccans stand out for criminal behaviour

Much has been written in recent weeks about the events in Ceuta. Too much of […]

Is NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte a traitor?

Legally, no. The Penal Code contains no article for a prime minister who governs his […]
- by The Liberum on 25/08/2026

The veil of oppression: Why the Belgian Burqa Ban is a victory for women's rights

When the debate over the burqa and other face-covering veils was beginning in Europe, I […]
- by The Liberum on 24/08/2026

The Climate Policy Trap: Why failure so often leads to more of the same

Group identity, social status, and a credential-dominated policy establishment have made the climate narrative increasingly […]

Wealth, reputation, office & procedural victory are not the highest goods

Disclaimer: references to individuals, institutions, documents, and conduct are deliberately anonymised and use language such […]