The French government recently banned a conference on remigration. This ban was imposed across the entire territory of France. In practical terms, this means remigration and the "great replacement" have become taboo subjects. Anyone who discusses these issues in public risks conviction and a prison sentence. Similar situations are unfolding in Great Britain and Germany, to prevent me and other ‘controversial’ individuals from sharing our views about what is happening in Europe. The normalisation of censorship of unwelcome opinions is a slippery slope.

By Filip Dewinter
The UK government introduced new censorship policies preventing entry into the country for speakers who dare to mention the themes of 'population replacement' and 'remigration'-invited to an event organised by Tommy Robinson. I was one of them, and I was refused entry at the border after British Prime Minister Keir Starmer banned me.

In Germany, the government is using the judicial system to stifle any debate on the "great replacement" and the alternative of remigration. Across Europe, the politically correct elite is employing repression to silence politicians and parties that dare to speak in favour of remigration.

Likewise, in Paris, at the prohibited remigration conference organised by former Front National Member of the European Parliament Jean-Yves Le Gallou, I was denied the opportunity to deliver my speech.

For this reason, I am publishing the text of my banned speech here:

Paris has become the symbol of the failure of multiculturalism and the chaos caused by mass immigration. I myself work and live in Brussels as a Member of Parliament. Brussels is, moreover, the source of all evils, because it is the capital of the UE, where the European Parliament and the European Commission sit.

The EU is primarily responsible for this policy of open borders and the mass invasion of migrants into our towns and cities. Within fifteen years, Brussels will probably be an Islamic city. It is quite a symbol!

A sad symbol, indeed.
 
Indeed, it is obvious: the capital of Europe is one of the most Islamised cities in Europe. More than 30% of the legal residents of the Brussels Region are Muslim, but in Saint-Josse-ten-Noode, Schaerbeek, and Molenbeek, Muslims already constitute a majority.

In other Brussels municipalities such as Koekelberg, Forest, and Saint-Gilles, Muslims represent between 30 and 40% of the population. If this trend continues, Brussels will officially be an Islamic city by 2040.

Some neighbourhoods already largely resemble "Bruxellistan." Within a few decades, the entire Brussels region will be affected.
 
Before we realise it, we will be confronted with Islamic enclaves in Europe. Informal Islamic caliphates; no-go zones where our authorities, our police, and our justice system will no longer have any grip, and where the imam will have replaced the mayor and the police commissioner.

And from there, it will be just a short step toward a totally segregated society where confrontation and violence will be the rule and the rule of law the exception. Or rather, areas where the State will retreat and its law will no longer be applied.
 
The recent riots all over Europe demonstrate this: we are facing young people of Arab-Muslim and African origin who are arriving en masse "to smash everything."
 
Brussels is an example of what is happening to many European cities: the replacement of the native population, leading to Islamisation.

Thinking we can solve all this in a so-called democratic way is an illusion. And even that is understated.
 
A serious mistake not to be made is to think that everything will be fine with Islam. Insisting on asserting that there can be such a thing as a "European Islam" is dangerous, and worse still, it is a form of self-destruction. There will be no European Islam; the only thing that will remain is an Islamised Europe.

There is no difference between what is called radical Islam and moderate Islam.
 
We have gone from 500,000 Muslims in Europe a quarter of a century ago to 46 million today. This is a true invasion that has turned into colonisation, not an economic colonisation, like those that took place in the past in Africa and Asia, but a demographic colonisation, leading to Islamization and Africanization. Import the Third World, and you become the Third World.
 
I observe a process of "reverse integration" in which we have to adapt to them. As the group of Muslims originating from North Africa grows, it gains in confidence and self-assertion. The message is clear: we are here to stay, on our own terms and by our own standards.

This self-assertion soon turns into arrogance, and arrogance into aggressiveness.
 
Democracy, to which we are so attached, risks becoming a weapon in our adversaries' hands. As soon as an ethnic or religious minority becomes a majority in a city, a region, or a country, democracy turns against us. And this is already happening. We do not have much time left.
 
Jean-Marie Le Pen used to say that "Islam is incompatible with European culture. It is dangerous as soon as it becomes dominant: when Muslims hold the controls, they subjugate others.

Yet they already constitute a serious threat at our gates; south of the Mediterranean, 200 million Muslims are weighing upon Europe. And Islamism is nothing other than the eldest son of immigration."
 
What is called "radical Islam" is comparable to a chick inside the egg of Islam. There is no radical or moderate Islam; Islam is quite simply Islam. Islam is incompatible with our European values and norms, whether it be gender equality, the separation of Church and State, freedom of expression, or democracy.

The term "Islamism" is an invention of the left, designed to promote the concept of a multicultural society. Islam is an ideology of conquest; the Quran acts as a "license to kill," and Sharia law is inseparable from Islam.

Religious freedom exists, a concept that, by the way, is stranger to Islam, and we respect this freedom. However, anyone who abuses this freedom to colonise us, refuses to assimilate, and demands that we adapt to them, can expect only one answer: REMIGRATION!
 
Behind the riots, the looting, the vandalism, and the violence lies a design: the destabilization of Europe. The objectives of the extreme left and of radical Islam converge, to a certain extent. It is the convergence of struggles… against European civilisation!

The extreme left considers that conflict and chaos are necessary for the advent of the ideal communist society, while radical Islam seeks to raze Europe to transform it into an Islamic caliphate. Though their ultimate goals differ and are, in reality, diametrically opposed, the means they employ are identical.
 
A civil war is looming, but in reality, we are already right in the middle of it. It is an illusion to believe that everything will eventually work out and that violence will disappear on its own. The problem has a name: immigration.

Today, we are reaping what the open-borders and pro-immigration lobby sowed yesterday. Illegal immigrants, radicalised Muslims, Maghrebi drug traffickers, African rioters, criminal foreigners, and their accomplices are the soldiers of an enemy army; the suburbs and the "no-go zones" constitute their barracks; the goods stolen from looted shops are their spoils of war; and stones, fireworks, as well as incendiary devices are their weapons!
 
The term "occupied territories" is often used incorrectly. But the major cities of the United Kingdom and France, as well as those of many Western European countries, are de facto territories occupied by the enemy.

In France, these occupants can now, with the help of local collaborators, loot and burn with total impunity, without anyone daring to oppose them. Formerly, this kind of thing only happened… well, yes, after a country had been taken by surprise by an enemy army.
 
Here we are. And we are the only ones who dare to make this observation. We will also be the only ones to act to stop the invasion.

Let there be no misunderstanding: we have no more time to waste; otherwise, we will all lose.