IAEA admits Iran not capable of nuclear bomb

Iran does not at this stage have enough enriched uranium to make one nuclear bomb under the U.N. atomic watchdog’s official definition, the agency’s head told an Austrian paper.

“The Iranians continue to enrich uranium, and to a much higher degree than they have committed themselves to. And this amount is growing by the month,” International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) head Rafael Grossi told Die Presse in an interview published on its website on Saturday.

Asked about how long Iran would need to build a nuclear weapon -- the so-called “breakout time”, he said:

“In the IAEA we do not talk about breakout time. We look at the significant quantity, the minimum amount of enriched uranium or plutonium needed to make an atomic bomb. Iran does not have this significant quantity at the moment.”

Iran denies ever having had a nuclear weapons programme, saying its nuclear programme is purely for energy purposes.

The IAEA defines “significant quantity” as the approximate amount of nuclear material for which the possibility of manufacturing a nuclear explosive device cannot be excluded.

The most recent quarterly IAEA report on Iran last month said it had 2,105.4 kg of enriched uranium, far above the 202.8 kg limit in a 2015 deal with big powers but a fraction of the enriched uranium it had before the accord.

It is also enriching to up to 4.5% purity, far below the 20% it achieved before the deal and the 90% that is considered weapons-grade.

Source: Reuters

 

The Liberum

The subtitle of The Liberum ("the voice of the people is the voice of God") reflects the concept that the collective opinions and will of the people carry divine importance. They embody truth and wisdom, particularly in a non-partisan arena that profiles itself as a marketplace of free ideas and thoughts.
See full bio >
The Liberum runs on your donation. Fight with us for a free society.
Donation Form (#6)

More articles you might like

King Charles, Trump, and the Anglo-Saxon rift: Britain’s quiet break from Washington on Iran

There is a moment in every alliance when something shifts—not with a declaration, not with […]

Pakistan in the Iran–Israel War: How a nuclear state became an unexpected broker of peace

In the aftermath of the Iran–Israel war, attention has largely remained fixed on the expected […]
- by Nadia Ahmad on 24/04/2026

The “Bad Kid” in the neighbourhood: Hezbollah and the language of conflict

It was a small phrase in a large diplomatic room, the kind of remark that […]
- by Nadia Ahmad on 21/04/2026

The Strait that thinks: Hormuz and the Strait of Peace

There are places on Earth that behave less like geography and more like thought. The […]

The ceasefire between Lebanon and Israel does not end the war, but reorganises it

A ceasefire between Lebanon and Israel after forty-five days of war. An interruption of hostilities, […]

The Religious dimension of geopolitics versus politics in general

The Iranian regime is a theocracy. It is tempting to state that this is nothing […]