Washington's invisible government

Just for clarity, the American Congress officially consists of 535 members. At least those are the people you see on television. The rest operates out of sight. In hotels. Behind closed doors. At donor receptions. In lobby offices without flags. The places where laws are no longer written with ideals, but with spreadsheets, networks, and campaign money.

And somewhere in that universe, one name has floated around for decades — a name that Europe treats with remarkable caution: AIPAC. The American Israel Public Affairs Committee.

Officially, a lobby organisation that strengthens the American-Israeli relationship. In practice, it is about as subtle as a hydraulic press on a human hand.

Because in Washington, every politician understands one thing: you may fight over taxes, climate, abortion, or wars, but Israel is a dossier where careers can suddenly evaporate.

Ask the congress members who suddenly found millions of dollars in opposition funding aimed at them after criticising bombings, Gaza, or settlement policies. As if, somewhere, a panic button were pressed and advertisements, commentators, and new candidates started falling from the sky.

Democracy — with turbocharged billionaires underneath it.

What is remarkable is not that lobby groups hold power. That is Washington. Big Pharma buys influence. Big Tech buys influence. Defence contractors buy influence. American politics increasingly resembles a luxury shopping mall where billionaires order policy like room service.

No, the remarkable thing is the fear.

The tension becomes visible the moment Israel enters the conversation. Journalists become more careful. Universities panic. Politicians suddenly speak as if they are crossing a legal minefield wearing socks.

And the same reflex always appears:

“Criticism of Israel is allowed… but…”

That “but” may be the most expensive word in Washington today.

Before that word, freedom of speech still fully exists. After that word, the phone calls begin.

Then the donors appear.
Then the think tanks appear.
Then the television panels appear.
Then the moral tribunals appear.

Meanwhile, the American taxpayer continues sending billions to a region where every new escalation is once again sold as necessary for peace.

A geopolitical subscription service for permanent instability.

Europe watches it all like a junior employee watching an aggressive boardroom meeting: silent, nervous, and hoping nobody asks a question.

Because European elites also understand how sensitive the subject has become. Universities, media organisations, and political parties walk on eggshells the moment Israeli power politics enters the discussion.

And that may be the strongest form of power of all.

Not censorship.

But a system in which people censor themselves before anyone even has to ask them to.

 

Max von Kreyfelt

Max von Kreyfelt is a well-known Dutch public figure. He is known as an independent thinker, opinion maker, and initiator of critical media platforms. He has played a key role in questioning power, the role of the mainstream media, and social structures. He was the founder of The Netherlands' most prominent opposition TV-channel Cafe WeltSchmertz.
See full bio >
The Liberum runs on your donation. Fight with us for a free society.
Donation Form (#6)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

More articles you might like

The post-Assad Levant and Israel’s minority anxiety

The post-Assad Levant is often described as another chapter in Syria’s long crisis, transition, or […]

Mercy – Technophobia meets revenge in real-time

Finally made myself watch Mercy (2026), with Chris Pratt as the falsely accused cop Chris […]

America’s Century of Humiliation?

There was a time when America saw itself as the final destination of history. The […]

Kahlil Gibran’s The Prophet turns 103

In a world that seems to be spinning faster every day, the words of Kahlil […]

The road to Beijing passes through Tehran

When Donald Trump arrived in Beijing for renewed negotiations with Xi Jinping, most observers focused […]

Magnum Farce – The ammo of assassination in America

I recently made the mistake of watching the second Dirty Harry movie, Magnum Force (1973), […]