The holy democracy and its chosen mediocrity

Some quotes belong on a decorative tile. Others should be carved into the walls of parliament. Not to inspire politicians, that would waste perfectly good stone, but to warn visitors exactly where they’ve walked into.

The modern politician is a triumph of evolution: a creature capable of being everywhere and accountable nowhere. He cuts ribbons on bridges built by engineers, claims credit for accidents that worked out well, and launches committees to investigate why the last committee achieved nothing. A perpetual motion machine powered by speeches and taxpayer money.

Yet within this broad species lives a rarer breed: the liberal democrat. This is the politician who markets himself as a defender of freedom while requiring a permit, a compliance form, a subsidy request, and an approved language guide for every liberty he celebrates. He loves the free market, provided government covers the losses. He defends the citizen, so long as that citizen thinks in officially sanctioned terms.

His favourite word is “values.” Not because he has any, but because it sounds excellent on television. His second favourite word is “complex.” He deploys it the moment anyone asks why housing is unaffordable, energy bills are punishing, borders are porous, and public trust has evaporated. Suddenly, everything is terribly complicated, except salaries, expense accounts, and pension arrangements.

What makes the liberal democrat truly remarkable is his gift for moral gymnastics. Today, he saves democracy by restricting speech. Tomorrow, he promotes inclusion by excluding dissenters. The day after that, he combats division with a campaign describing half the country as ignorant, dangerous, or vulnerable to misinformation.

And still he sees himself as civilisation’s last line of defence. That may be his finest accomplishment: turning failure into virtue, selling managerial emptiness as stability, and wrapping contempt for voters in the language of responsibility.

Meanwhile, the citizen is invited to applaud, pay, and remain quiet. Once every few years, he is handed a pencil and told he is sovereign, free to choose which polished manager will spend the next term explaining why nothing can be done, except raising taxes.

Perhaps Patton was wrong. Perhaps politicians are not the lowest form of life on earth.

Parasites, after all, sometimes give something back.

 

Max von Kreyfelt

Max von Kreyfelt is a well-known Dutch public figure. He is known as an independent thinker, opinion maker, and initiator of critical media platforms. He has played a key role in questioning power, the role of the mainstream media, and social structures. He was the founder of The Netherlands' most prominent opposition TV-channel Cafe WeltSchmertz.
See full bio >
The Liberum runs on your donation. Fight with us for a free society.
Donation Form (#6)

More articles you might like

After Ceuta, the focus is on migrants from the Maghreb: Moroccans stand out for criminal behaviour

Much has been written in recent weeks about the events in Ceuta. Too much of […]

Brand New Day: When a cinematic universe has three life cycles

Marvel has been suffering a whole series of duds since the halcyon days of End […]

Is NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte a traitor?

Legally, no. The Penal Code contains no article for a prime minister who governs his […]
- by The Liberum on 25/08/2026

The veil of oppression: Why the Belgian Burqa Ban is a victory for women's rights

When the debate over the burqa and other face-covering veils was beginning in Europe, I […]
- by The Liberum on 24/08/2026

The Climate Policy Trap: Why failure so often leads to more of the same

Group identity, social status, and a credential-dominated policy establishment have made the climate narrative increasingly […]

From Assad to Erdogan: How Israel and the U.S. made the wrong chess move

Israel's northern horizon is changing, and this time the name causing concern in Jerusalem is […]