The holy democracy and its chosen mediocrity

Some quotes belong on a decorative tile. Others should be carved into the walls of parliament. Not to inspire politicians, that would waste perfectly good stone, but to warn visitors exactly where they’ve walked into.

The modern politician is a triumph of evolution: a creature capable of being everywhere and accountable nowhere. He cuts ribbons on bridges built by engineers, claims credit for accidents that worked out well, and launches committees to investigate why the last committee achieved nothing. A perpetual motion machine powered by speeches and taxpayer money.

Yet within this broad species lives a rarer breed: the liberal democrat. This is the politician who markets himself as a defender of freedom while requiring a permit, a compliance form, a subsidy request, and an approved language guide for every liberty he celebrates. He loves the free market, provided government covers the losses. He defends the citizen, so long as that citizen thinks in officially sanctioned terms.

His favourite word is “values.” Not because he has any, but because it sounds excellent on television. His second favourite word is “complex.” He deploys it the moment anyone asks why housing is unaffordable, energy bills are punishing, borders are porous, and public trust has evaporated. Suddenly, everything is terribly complicated, except salaries, expense accounts, and pension arrangements.

What makes the liberal democrat truly remarkable is his gift for moral gymnastics. Today, he saves democracy by restricting speech. Tomorrow, he promotes inclusion by excluding dissenters. The day after that, he combats division with a campaign describing half the country as ignorant, dangerous, or vulnerable to misinformation.

And still he sees himself as civilisation’s last line of defence. That may be his finest accomplishment: turning failure into virtue, selling managerial emptiness as stability, and wrapping contempt for voters in the language of responsibility.

Meanwhile, the citizen is invited to applaud, pay, and remain quiet. Once every few years, he is handed a pencil and told he is sovereign, free to choose which polished manager will spend the next term explaining why nothing can be done, except raising taxes.

Perhaps Patton was wrong. Perhaps politicians are not the lowest form of life on earth.

Parasites, after all, sometimes give something back.

 

Max von Kreyfelt

Max von Kreyfelt is a well-known Dutch public figure. He is known as an independent thinker, opinion maker, and initiator of critical media platforms. He has played a key role in questioning power, the role of the mainstream media, and social structures. He was the founder of The Netherlands' most prominent opposition TV-channel Cafe WeltSchmertz.
See full bio >
The Liberum runs on your donation. Fight with us for a free society.
Donation Form (#6)

More articles you might like

- by Arthur Blok on 06/05/2026

Tommy Robinson at Paris MEGA-conference: “Unite the West and let’s make Europe great again”

A distinguished conference behind closed doors organised by the growing Patriots Network, attended by European […]
- by Adriana Lebbos on 06/05/2026

My Name is Agneta

There are films that tell a story, and then there are films that undo you […]

The storm is coming: Superman in the Oval Office and why powerful men keep trying to wear the cape

There was a time when presidents tried to look presidential: a dark suit, a serious […]

King Charles, Trump, and the Anglo-Saxon rift: Britain’s quiet break from Washington on Iran

There is a moment in every alliance when something shifts—not with a declaration, not with […]

The external siege of Armenia’s elections: How foreign networks are working to derail the South Caucasus Peace

Armenian voters will head to the polls (June 7) in what may be the most […]

Richards Lives – When remakes ‘occasionally’ hit the mark

I’m surprised the online critics have panned the new version of The Running Man (2025). […]