The holy democracy and its chosen mediocrity

Some quotes belong on a decorative tile. Others should be carved into the walls of parliament. Not to inspire politicians, that would waste perfectly good stone, but to warn visitors exactly where they’ve walked into.

The modern politician is a triumph of evolution: a creature capable of being everywhere and accountable nowhere. He cuts ribbons on bridges built by engineers, claims credit for accidents that worked out well, and launches committees to investigate why the last committee achieved nothing. A perpetual motion machine powered by speeches and taxpayer money.

Yet within this broad species lives a rarer breed: the liberal democrat. This is the politician who markets himself as a defender of freedom while requiring a permit, a compliance form, a subsidy request, and an approved language guide for every liberty he celebrates. He loves the free market, provided government covers the losses. He defends the citizen, so long as that citizen thinks in officially sanctioned terms.

His favourite word is “values.” Not because he has any, but because it sounds excellent on television. His second favourite word is “complex.” He deploys it the moment anyone asks why housing is unaffordable, energy bills are punishing, borders are porous, and public trust has evaporated. Suddenly, everything is terribly complicated, except salaries, expense accounts, and pension arrangements.

What makes the liberal democrat truly remarkable is his gift for moral gymnastics. Today, he saves democracy by restricting speech. Tomorrow, he promotes inclusion by excluding dissenters. The day after that, he combats division with a campaign describing half the country as ignorant, dangerous, or vulnerable to misinformation.

And still he sees himself as civilisation’s last line of defence. That may be his finest accomplishment: turning failure into virtue, selling managerial emptiness as stability, and wrapping contempt for voters in the language of responsibility.

Meanwhile, the citizen is invited to applaud, pay, and remain quiet. Once every few years, he is handed a pencil and told he is sovereign, free to choose which polished manager will spend the next term explaining why nothing can be done, except raising taxes.

Perhaps Patton was wrong. Perhaps politicians are not the lowest form of life on earth.

Parasites, after all, sometimes give something back.

 

Max von Kreyfelt

Max von Kreyfelt is a well-known Dutch public figure. He is known as an independent thinker, opinion maker, and initiator of critical media platforms. He has played a key role in questioning power, the role of the mainstream media, and social structures. He was the founder of The Netherlands' most prominent opposition TV-channel Cafe WeltSchmertz.
See full bio >

More articles you might like

France must choose between the financial plague and financial cholera

France is not bankrupt. It is even worse: it is rich enough to postpone reckoning, […]

Catch me if you Can, Cam, Came – Unabomber

A curious thing happened to me. I was trying to watch the new Netflix feature […]

The billion-dollar paradox of the Dutch moralizer

The Netherlands has implemented an import and trade ban on products from Israeli settlements in […]

The Hamas octopus: Global jihad brings Hamas October 7 terror to Europe

‘Jews are everywhere, and we have to attack every Jew on the globe by way […]
- by Rami Audi on 06/10/2026

The Lone Star principle: Why America needs its States 

An old American phrase carries an almost accidental political irony: Gone with the wind. In […]

The Aliyev doctrine: How Azerbaijan defines its place in the world

Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev addressed the 8th Congress of the New Azerbaijan Party (YAP) in […]